FA Charges Hazard Over Ball Boy Incident

by David on January 26, 2013

Eden Hazard has been hit with a misconduct charge after the FA decided a three-match ban was not a tough enough penalty for kicking Swansea ball boy Charlie Morgan.

Hazard’s case will be heard by an independent commission, who will decide if additional punishment is appropriate.

Chelsea have until Tuesday to present their case and it will be dealt with next week. South Wales police have confirmed they will not investigate the incident, and Chelsea hoped new TV footage might persuade the FA to do the same.

But the FA released a statement yesterday to say a three-match ban for Hazard was

‘clearly insufficient’.

Chelsea will present a dossier backing Hazard, to include TV footage and reference to his swift apology and previous good behaviour.

The incident has upset the Belgian, whose agent John Biko has flown to London to support him, and an extended ban for Hazard would be a blow for Rafa Benitez, who said: ‘He was really doing well. We’ll miss a good player.’

Potential Chelsea games Hazard could miss
Sunday: Brentford FA Cup Fourth Round (a)
Wednesday: Reading (a)
February 2: Newcastle United (a)
February 9: Wigan Athletic (h)
Feb 16: FA Cup 5th Round
February 24: Manchester City (a)
March 2: West Brom (h)

The big one there is obviously the trip to Man City in a month’s time. So hopefully the FA give Hazard an addition two match ban (5 games total) and not a six game ban.


{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

Amos o emmanuel January 26, 2013 at 7:25 pm

Rafa must go.

Reply

dike michael c January 26, 2013 at 7:35 pm

Are those FA not human being, what of if it was the ball boy .all i know is that it was something that cause something.

Reply

Shehu iriafen January 26, 2013 at 7:45 pm

My comment is a question. Yes Hazard has done something wrong and he is being purnished what is going to be the purnishment for the young lad who has also done wrong by not doing his job properly. In africa we believe that purnishment is for correction, if the boy, 17 ie Piason’s age mate is not purnish will he or others not repeat such act. Have similar incidents of the past been purnish with 5 match ban? if not why should Hazard be over purnish? I think the FA is setting a bad precedence. And playing double standards.

Reply

Richard January 26, 2013 at 9:20 pm

FA is unfair wit chelsea

Reply

Afo January 26, 2013 at 9:26 pm

Fa decision is too harsh on eh

Reply

Bolhajie January 26, 2013 at 10:27 pm

FA itz unfair aterall d ball boy was guilty also

Reply

Adesoji January 26, 2013 at 10:30 pm

Pls 4give my man he doesn’t deserve 2 be punished he also has somtin 2 say

Reply

ijeh segun January 26, 2013 at 10:46 pm

They ar just after his money, it’s an opportunity 4 them 2 make some thousand pounds out of his wallet” so, that case can never bn drop so easily like that” even if heaven come calling them bcus of dir inconpetent dubious characters in that british FA, house” as just a similar case 2 John terry” case whereby a large siting court have’ d ruled on a case that was brought by d BFA, wit out dir favour, and stil went ahead 2 fined a formula 2 overuled d court jurgement that was 2 stand in favour of terry” later came by wit must paid penalty of 270,000,000 pounds of fined. i tink dir real of operative is not clearly understood by public, thank u.

Reply

ijeh segun January 26, 2013 at 11:04 pm

They ar just after his money, and is obvious, it’s just an opportunity 4 them, 2 make some thousand pounds out of his wallet” u see, that case can never bn drop so easily like that” even if heaven come calling them bcus of dir inconpetent dubious characters in that british FA, house” as just a similar case 2 John terry” case whereby a large siting court have’d ruled on a case that was brought by d BFA, the said case was ruled wit out dir favour, and they stil went ahead 2 fined a formula 2 overuled d court jurgement that was 2 stand in favour of terry”and still later came bye wit a must paid penalty of 270,000,000 pounds of fined. i tink how they ar realy operative is not clearly understood by d public, thank u.

Reply

chubby January 26, 2013 at 11:38 pm

Serves him right, he should learn how not to be a barbarian nxt tym.

Reply

vallentino January 27, 2013 at 4:58 am

I won’t rafa go then i wish chel to bring barck dimatio or morinho or moyes

Reply

stephen fash January 27, 2013 at 5:32 am

They suppose to punish the ballboy called charlie morgan

Reply

lucky January 27, 2013 at 8:37 am

Fa another word for pathetic

Reply

Lawal Ademola January 27, 2013 at 8:43 am

F A is unfair based on Hazard punishment

Reply

Lawal Ademola January 27, 2013 at 8:45 am

This is highly melancholically

Reply

Deefikzy January 27, 2013 at 9:17 am

FA is so unfair having seen video wich showed how wrong the ballboy was(a boy that has less than a year to turn 18) rafa is not a good coach he has no confibent in himself.

Reply

Emmanuel Jerome January 27, 2013 at 9:18 am

FA what is the punishment for the ballboy ? Is very unfai… If you stand on one side.

Reply

jack January 27, 2013 at 3:35 pm

And will the FA do to the boy?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: